tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post4916741359854565360..comments2023-12-29T01:08:02.965+00:00Comments on The ferret fancier: Supermarket medicineGarth Marenghihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07373175498875348430noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post-82007365951602925152011-09-13T17:36:51.706+01:002011-09-13T17:36:51.706+01:00Hello, this post help me a lot because i have been...Hello, this post help me a lot because i have been looking this kind of information for an university project.invertir en orohttp://www.inversionesenoro.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post-81486132151257206502009-09-26T10:09:35.087+01:002009-09-26T10:09:35.087+01:00in one word 'no'
many quack roles are jus...in one word 'no'<br /><br />many quack roles are just plain expensive and dangerous<br /><br />to argue that they are proven in utterly nonsensical<br /><br />shocking bad practice is virtually always hidden in the NHS, there is the odd exception like Stafford, but 99.99% of stuff is never out in the open<br /><br />to claim some of the new roles for HCPs are safe is this light is utterlyGarth Marenghihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07373175498875348430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post-10524444281886521402009-09-24T09:49:56.128+01:002009-09-24T09:49:56.128+01:00'common sense is much better than some very fl...'common sense is much better than some very flimsy evidence' - agreed, Ferret, so why can't doctors finally acknowledged that ten years of quackdom have hardly resulted in the bloodbath predicted by the medical Jonah's?<br /><br />I can accept medics are opposed to the quack model on the basis of role demarkation, etc but there is no evidence (however imperfect the studies may be)the a&e charge nursenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post-78870535624742141742009-09-24T06:40:07.137+01:002009-09-24T06:40:07.137+01:00common sense is much better than some very flimsy ...common sense is much better than some very flimsy evidence<br /><br />give me some decent randomised controlled trials then you have a point, you won't be able to i'm afraid<br /><br />less training equals poorer care i'm afraid<br /><br />it's true for doctors with ewtd and it's true for quacks trying to be gps with no decent training in medicineGarth Marenghihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07373175498875348430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post-41580775094898649892009-09-23T21:57:34.393+01:002009-09-23T21:57:34.393+01:00there are numerous flaws with that study.
even if...there are numerous flaws with that study.<br /><br />even if one assumes that there is a rise in the death rate then it's most likely because all new doctors spend about three days off the wards attending ridiculous politically correct induction sessions and not attending to sick patients<br /><br />you can find whatever you want with a studyGarth Marenghihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07373175498875348430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post-10217934356897085222009-09-23T10:23:47.198+01:002009-09-23T10:23:47.198+01:00Recent 'stud' - perhaps this is taking ...Recent 'stud' - perhaps this is taking 'stats-porn' a little to far?<br /><br />Should say studythe a&e charge nursenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610428148049675668.post-64123337913730198132009-09-23T10:21:50.408+01:002009-09-23T10:21:50.408+01:00Good to see you back Ferret - anyway, enough of th...Good to see you back Ferret - anyway, enough of the niceties. <br /><br />According to a recent stud there is a 6% increase in mortality risk amongst patients treated by the August cohort of junior doctors - the so called 'killing season'.<br />http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8269729.stm<br /><br />No such risk has ever been associated with the quacks yet they are characterised (by you)the a&e charge nursenoreply@blogger.com